Studi e Saggi Linguistici

Vol. 61 No 2 (2023)
Articoli

A refinement of the definition of Manner and its expression through Italian indefinites

Accès sous abonnement ou avec frais PDF (English) (6 EUR)
  • Gina Russo
Gina Russo
Università degli Studi dell'Insubria
DOI : https://doi.org/10.4454/ssl.v61i2.348

Publiée 2024-01-24

Mention de droit d'auteur

Résumé

The aim of this paper is to study how Manner is coded in Italian through expressions other than the verb, specifically investigating expressions containing the paucal indefinites niente (“nothing”), qualcosina (“something.DIM.”), poc-/po’ (“a few”, “a little”), certo (“a certain”) and the pattern N/V [da N/V] (“N/V[da.PREP. N/V]”), such as: come niente (“in an effortless way”), mangiamo qualcosina (“let’s eat together spending some time leisurely”) scrive un po’ (“s/he writes without commitment”), certi sguardi (“certain peculiar looks”), sguardi da far paura (“scary looks”). This work complements the vast literature on the subject, mainly focused on manner of motion verbs. For this purpose, 6000 occurrences were extracted and analysed using a corpus-based and corpus-driven approach. The hypothesis is that paucal indefinite items semantically change along a path of the type Quantity > Quality > Manner. The results substantiate this hypothesis and help refine the definition of Manner from an onomasiological point of view.

Accès sous abonnement ou avec frais PDF (English) (6 EUR)

Références

  1. References
  2. AKITA, K. AND MATSUMOTO, Y. (2020), A fine-grained analysis of manner salience. Experimental
  3. evidence from Japanese and English, in MATUSUMOTO, Y. AND KAWACHI, K. (2020),
  4. Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
  5. ANTONOPOULOU, E. (1987), Prototype theory and the meaning of verbs, with special reference to
  6. modern Greek verbs of motion, University of London.
  7. BARONI, M. ET AL. (2009), The WaCky wide web: a collection of very large linguistically processed web-
  8. crawled corpora, in «Language Resources and Evaluation» N° 43, pp. 209-226.
  9. BAZZANELLA, C. (2011), Indeterminacy in dialogue, in «Language and Dialogue» 1:1, pp. 21-43.
  10. BENIGNI V. (2017), Una festa da paura! Mi sono divertito da morire! Gli intensificatori iperbolici
  11. dell’italiano e la loro resa in russo, in «Studia de Cultura», N° 9/1, pp. 5-18.
  12. BERMAN, R.A. AND SLOBIN, D.I. (1994, eds.), Relating events in narrative. A crosslinguistic
  13. developmental study, Psychology Press, New York/London.
  14. BERTINETTO, P.M. (2001), On a frequent misunderstanding in the temporal-aspectual domain: the
  15. ‘perfective-telic confusion’, in Cecchetto, C. et al (2001 eds.), Semantic Interfaces. Reference,
  16. Anaphora and Aspect, CSLI Publications, Stanford.
  17. CACCHIANI, S. (2017), Cognitive motivation in English complex intensifying adjectives, in «Lexis» N° 10.
  18. CERNECCA, D. (1971), L’espressione della modalità nell’italiano moderno, in «Forum Italicum»
  19. Vol. 5/3, pp. 416-433.
  20. CORBETT, C. (2000), Number, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  21. CORONA, L. AND PIETRANDREA, P. (2021), In a manner of speaking. The co-construction of manner
  22. in spoken Italian dialogues, in MAURI, C., FIORENTINI, I., GORIA, E. (2021, eds.), Building
  23. categories in interaction: linguistic resources at work, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
  24. CORONA, L. AND RUSSO, G. (in preparation), Italian deverbal verbs in -Vcchiare: a Manner of
  25. Approximating.
  26. DAVIDSE, K., VANDELANOTTE, L. AND CUYCKENS, H. (2010), Subjectification, intersubjectification
  27. and grammaticalization, Hubert and Co. GmbH and Co, Göttingen.
  28. DE MAURO, T. AND VOGHERA, M. (1996), Scala mobile. Un punto di vista sui lessemi complessi, in
  29. Benincà, P. et al. (1996 eds.), Italiano e dialetti nel tempo, Bulzoni, Roma, pp.99-131.
  30. DESSÌ SCHMID, S. (2019), Aspectuality. An Onomasiological Model Applied to the Romance
  31. Languages, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.
  32. DIK, S. (1975), The semantic representation of manner adverbials, in KRAAK, A. (1975, ed.),
  33. Linguistics in the Netherlands 1972-1973, Van Gorcum, Assen/Amsterdam, pp. 96-121.
  34. DIVJAK, D. (2010), Structuring the lexicon. A clustered model for near-synonymy, De Gruyter,
  35. Berlin/New York.
  36. GHEZZI C. (2013), Vagueness Markers in Contemporary Italian: Intergenerational Variation and
  37. Pragmatic Change [PhD Thesis].
  38. GODDARD, C. AND WIERZBICKA, A. (2002), Meaning and Universal Grammar. Theory and
  39. empirical findings. Vol. 1, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
  40. GONZÁLES GARCÍA, L. (1997), El adverbio en español, Universidad de la Coruña, Coruña. 24
  41. GRÉA, P. (2012), Deux-trois mots » sur les déterminants de petite quantité : pluriel continu et
  42. perception sémantique, in «Journal of French Language Studies» 23, pp. 193-219.
  43. HASPELMATH, M. (1997), Indefinte pronouns, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  44. HEINE, B. (2002), On the role of context in grammaticalization, in Ilse, W. and Diewald, G. (2002
  45. eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadephia.
  46. HIMMELMANN, N.P. (2004), Lexicalization and grammaticalization: opposite or orthogonal?, in
  47. BISANG, W. et al. (2004 eds.), What makes grammaticalization: a look from its components
  48. and its fringers, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 21-42.
  49. IACOBINI, C. AND VERGARO, C. (2012), Manner of motion verbs in Italian: semantic distinctions
  50. and interlingual comparisons, in FERRERI, S. (2012, ed.), Atti del XLIV Congresso
  51. Internazionale di Studi della SLI, Bulzoni, Roma, pp. 71–87.
  52. LAVRIC, E. (2010), Hyperbolic approximative numerals in cross-cultural comparison, in
  53. KALTENBÖCK, G., MIHATSCH, W., SCHNEIDER, S. (2010, eds.), New Approaches to Hedging,
  54. Emerald, Bingley, pp. 123-164.
  55. LEGALLOIS, D. (2007a), Analyse des constructions du type ‘c’est une affaire de minutes’,
  56. ‘c’est l’histoire d’une minute’, in «Verbum» XXIX, 3-4.
  57. LEGALLOIS, D. (2007b), Le connecteur ‘histoire (de)’ au regard de ses occurrences dans Frantext, in
  58. «Syntaxe et Sémantique» 2007/1, No 8, pp. 61-74.
  59. LEGALLOIS, D. (2012), From grammaticalization to expressive constructions, in BOUVERET,
  60. E., LEGALLOIS, D., (2012, eds.), Constructions in French, John Benjamins,
  61. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 257-281.
  62. LO NOSTRO, M. (2019), Les expressions figées, un possible atout pour créer des points de repère: la
  63. «géolocalisation linguistique», in «Testi e Linguaggi», Vol. 13, pp. 34-48.
  64. MASINI, F., MAURI, C. AND PIETRANDREA, A. (2018), List constructions: Towards a unified
  65. account, in «Italian Journal of Linguistics» N° 30/1, pp.49-94.
  66. MIHATSCH, W. (2010a), Les approximateurs quantitatifs entre scalarité et non-scalarité, in
  67. «Langua française» N° 165, pp. 125-153.
  68. MIHATSCH, W. (2010b), The Diachrony of Rounders and Adaptors: Approximation and
  69. Unidirectional Change, in KALTENBÖCK, G., MIHATSCH, W., SCHNEIDER, S. (2010, eds.),
  70. New Approaches to Hedging, Emerald, Bingley, pp. 93-122.
  71. MILLER, J.E., (1970), Stative verbs in russian, in «Foundations of Language» Vol. 6 N° 4, pp.
  72. -504.
  73. MINOCCHERI, C. AND STOSIC, D. (2022), La manière dans tous ses états : une étude exploratoire sur
  74. corpus, in «SHS Web of Conferences» 138, Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
  75. - CMLF 2022.
  76. MOLINE, E. AND STOSIC, D. (2016), L’expression de la manière en français, Éditions Ophyris,
  77. Paris.
  78. NOBILI, C. (2019), I gesti dell’italiano, Carocci, Roma.
  79. NORRICK, N.R., (1981), Semiotic principles in semantic theory, John Benjamins,
  80. Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
  81. PIUNNO, V. (2017), Combinazioni di parole parzialmente riempite. Formati e rappresentazione
  82. lessicografica, in «Studia de Cultura» N° 9/3, pp. 103-113. 25
  83. PRENDES ALVAROGONZÁLES, L. (2021), Alternancia de adjetivos, adverbios y grupos
  84. preposicionales en la expresión de la circunstancia de manera, in «Círculo de lingüística
  85. aplicada a la comunicación» N° 85, pp. 89-111.
  86. PULMAN, S. (1983), Word Meaning and Belief, Croom Helm, London.
  87. ROMAN, A. AND RÉMI-GIRAUD, S. (1998), Autour du circonstant, Presses Universitaires de
  88. Lyon, Lyon.
  89. RUSSO, G. (2017), Due parole tra dieci minuti. Diacronia dei numeri vaghi [Master Thesis],
  90. Univrsity of Salerno.
  91. RUSSO, G. (2021), Il path Quantità > Qualità > Maniera. Il caso degli indefiniti [PhD Thesis],
  92. University of Salerno.
  93. SCHWARZE, C. (2009), Grammatica della lingua italiana, Carocci, Roma.
  94. SERIANNI, L. AND CASTELVECCHI, A. (2003 [1997]), Le garzantine. Italiano, Garzanti, Milano.
  95. SLOBIN, D. I. (2004), The many ways to search for a frog: linguistic typology and the expression of
  96. motion events, in STRÖMQVIST, S. AND VERHOEVEN L. (2004, eds.), Relating events in
  97. narrative: typological and contextual perspectives, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp. 219-
  98. SLOBIN, D. I. (2006), What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology,
  99. discourse, and cognition, in HICKMANN, M. AND ROBERT, S. (2006 eds.), Space in languages:
  100. linguistic systems and cognitive categories, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia,
  101. pp. 59-81.
  102. SMITH, C. (2012), Tense and aspect: time across languages, in MAIENBORN, C. ET AL. (2012 eds.),
  103. Semantics. An international handbook of natural language meaning, Vol. 3, De Gruyter,
  104. Berlin/Boston, pp. 2581-2607.
  105. STOSIC, D. (2020), Defining the concept of Manner: an attempt to order chaos, in «Testi e
  106. Linguaggi», Vol.14.
  107. TALMY, L. (1972), Semantic structures in English and Atsugewi, University of California,
  108. Berkley.
  109. TALMY, L. (2000), Toward a cognitive semantics, Volume II: Typology and process in concept
  110. structuring, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
  111. TRAUGOTT, E.C. (1988), Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization, in Proceedings of the
  112. Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkley Linguistics Society, pp.406-416.
  113. TRAUGOTT, E.C. (1989), On the rise of epistemic meaning in English: an example of subjectification
  114. in semantic change, in «Language» N° 65, pp. 31-55.
  115. TRAUGOTT, E.C. (1995), The role of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization, Paper
  116. presented at ICHL XII, Manchester.
  117. TRAUGOTT, E.C. AND DASHER, R.B. (2002), Regularity in semantic change, Cambridge
  118. University Press, Cambridge.
  119. TRAUGOTT, E.C. (2018), rethinking the role of invited inferencing in change from the perspective of
  120. interactional texts, in «Open Linguistics» Vol. 4/1, pp. 19-34.
  121. VENDLER, Z. (1967), Linguistics in Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
  122. VIOLI, P. (1997), Significato ed esperienza, Bompiani, Milano.
  123. VOGHERA, M. (2004), Polirematiche, in Grossmann, M. and Rainer, P. (2004 eds.), La formazione
  124. delle parole in italiano, Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp. 56-69. VOGHERA, M. (2012), Chitarre, violino, banjo e cose del genere, in THORNTON, A. AND VOGHERA,
  125. M. (2012, eds.), Per Tullio De Mauro, Aracne, Roma.
  126. VOGHERA, M. (2017), Costruzioni di piccoli numeri: la vaghezza intenzionale in funzione, in Balaş,
  127. O.D. et al. (2017, eds.), L’expression de l’imprécision dans les langues romanes, Bucareşti
  128. Ars docendi, Universitatea din Bucareşti, pp.162-175.
  129. VOGHERA, M. (2019), Numeral constructions in Spoken Italian and Spanish: from quantitative
  130. approximation to interpersonal relationship, in «Normas» 9, pp. 221-233.
  131. Corpora
  132. Volip: https://www.volip.it/interroga-per-lemmi-e-forme
  133. CorDIC: http://corporadidattici.lablita.it/
  134. ItWac: https://bellatrix.sslmit.unibo.it/noske/public/#dashboard?corpname=itwac_full
  135. ItTenTen16: https://app.sketchengine.eu/#dashboard?corpname=preloaded%2Fittenten16_2
  136. DiaCORIS: http://corpora.dslo.unibo.it/DiaCORIS/
  137. OVI: http://gattoweb.ovi.cnr.it/(S(qefzryjrh14ibgojmcsuxzex))/CatForm01.aspx