Studi e Saggi Linguistici

Vol. 59 No 2 (2021)
Articoli

Translation strategies in the Vetus Latina: a pilot study on the book of Genesis

  • Michele Bianconi
Michele Bianconi
Università per Stranieri di Siena / University of Oxford
DOI : https://doi.org/10.4454/ssl.v59i2.305

Publiée 2022-01-10

Mots-clés

  • Bible translations,
  • language contact,
  • Christian Latin
Mention de droit d'auteur

Résumé

The aim of this paper is to contribute to our understanding of the language Vetus Latina version of the Bible, with a specific focus on the book of Genesis. Through the analysis of the translations of Greek neologisms, it will be argued that the first Latin translators of the Old Testament were native speakers of Latin, who had a good knowledge of Greek but made rather conservative choices, and aimed at literalism in following their Septuaginta source.

Références

  1. ADAMS, J. N. (2003), Bilingualism and the Latin Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  2. ADAMS, J. N. – JANSE, M. – SWAIN, S. (2002, eds.), Bilingualism in Ancient Society: Language Contact and the Written Text. Oxford, University Press, Oxford.
  3. BAKKER, P. – MATRAS, Y. (2013), Contact Languages. A Comprehensive Guide. De Gruyter, Boston/Berlin.
  4. BLANC, A. – CHRISTOL, A. (1999, edd.), Langues en contact dans l’antiquité. Aspects lexicaux, A.D.R.A, Nancy.
  5. BOGAERT, P.-M. (2013), The Latin Bible, in CARLETON PAGET, J. – SCHAPER, J. (2013, edd.), The New Cambridge History of the Bible (New Cambridge History of the Bible), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 505–526.
  6. BRIQUEL-CHATONNET, F. (1996, ed.) Mosaïque de langues, mosaïque culturelle: Le Bilinguisme dans le Proche-Orient ancien, Jean Maisonneuve, Paris.
  7. BURTON, P.H. (2000), The Old Latin Gospels: a study of their texts and language, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  8. CAMPANILE, E. – CARDONA, G.R. – LAZZERONI, R. (1988, edd.), Bilinguismo e biculturalismo nel mondo antico: atti del colloquio interdisciplinare tenuto a Pisa il 28 e 29 settembre 1987, Giardini, Pisa.
  9. CONDE SILVESTRE, J.C. (2007), Sociolingüística histórica, Gredos, Madrid.
  10. EVERSON, D.L. (2012), The Vetus Latina and the Vulgate of the Book of Genesis , in EVANS, C.A. et al. (2012, edd.), The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation, Brill, Leiden, pp. 516–536.
  11. FERRI, R. (2017), Regional Differentiation and the Old Latin Bible?, in «Linguarum Varietas», 6, pp. 269–276.
  12. FISCHER, B. (1972), Das neue Testament in lateinischen Sprache, in ALAND, K. (1972, ed.), Die alten Übersetzungen des Neuen Testaments, die Kirchenväterzitate und Lektionare, de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, pp. 1-92.
  13. GREAVES, M. (2007), Jerome’s Hebrew Philology. A Study Based on his Commentary on Jeremiah, Brill, Leiden.
  14. HAHNEMAN, G.M. (1992), The Muratorian Fragment and the Development of the Canon, Clarendon, Oxford.
  15. HASPELMATH, M. – TADMOR, U. (2009), Loanwords In The World’s Languages: A Comparative Handbook, de Gruyter Mouton, Berlin.
  16. HEINE, B. – KUTEVA, T. (2005), Language Contact and Grammatical Change, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  17. HERNÁNDEZ CAMPOY, J.M. – CONDE SILVESTRE, J.C. (2012, edd.), The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  18. HICKEY, R. (2010), The Handbook of language Contact, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester/Malden (MA).
  19. HICKEY, R. (2017), The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  20. HIEBERT, R.J.V. (2012), Textual And Translation Issues in Greek Genesis, in EVANS C.A. et al. (2012, edd.), The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation, Brill, Leiden, pp. 405–426.
  21. KAMESAR, A. (1993), Jerome, Greek scholarship, and the Hebrew Bible: a study of the Quaestiones hebraicae in Genesim, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  22. KAMESAR, A. (2013), Jerome, in CARLETON PAGET, J. – SCHAPER, J. (edd.), The New Cambridge History of the Bible (New Cambridge History of the Bible), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 653–675.
  23. KEDAR-KOPFSTEIN, B. (1988), The Latin Translations, in Mulder, M.J. (1988, ed.), Mikra: Text, Translation, Reading and Interpretation of the Hebrew Bible in Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity, Van Gorcum, Assen, pp. 299–338.
  24. LABOV, W. (1994), Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol.1: Internal Factors, Blackwell, Cambridge (MA)/Oxford.
  25. MANCINI, M. – LORENZETTI, L. (2013), Le lingue del Mediterraneo antico. Culture, mutamenti, contatti, Carocci, Roma.
  26. MAROTTA, G. – ROVAI, F. (2015, edd.), Ancient Languages between Variation and Norm, in «Studi e Saggi Linguistici», vol. 53/2.
  27. MATRAS, Y. (2009), Language Contact, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  28. MCDONALD, K. (2015), Oscan in Southern Italy and Sicily, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  29. MCKENZIE, J.L. (1975 [19651]), Dictionary of the Bible, G. Chapman, London.
  30. MEISER, G. – HACKSTEIN, O. (2005, edd.), Sprachkontakt und Sprachwandel. Akten der XI. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, 17.-23. September 2000, Halle an der Saale, Reichert, Wiesbaden.
  31. METZGER, B.M. (1977), Early Versions of the New Testament, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  32. MOLINELLI, P. – PUTZU, I. (2015, edd.), Modelli epistemologici, metodologie della ricerca e qualità del dato. Dalla linguistica storica alla sociolinguistica storica. Franco Angeli, Milano.
  33. MYERS SCOTTON, C. (2002), Contact Linguistics. Bilingual Encounters and Grammatical Outcomes, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  34. MYERS SCOTTON, C. (2006), Multiple Voices. An Introduction to Bilingualism, Blackwell Publishing, Malden (MA).
  35. PALMER, L.R. (1954), The Latin Language, Faber & Faber, London.
  36. ROMAINE, S. (1982), Socio-Historical Linguistics. Its Status and Methodology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  37. SCHILDENBERGER, J. (1952), Die Itala des hi. Augustinus, in Fischer, B. – Fiala, V. (1952, eds.). Colligere Fragmenta: Festschrift Alban Dold, Beuroner Kunstverlag, Beuron, pp. 84-102.
  38. SUNDBERG, A.C. JR. (1973), Canon Muratori. A Fourth-Century List, in «The Harvard Theological Review», 66/1, pp. 1–41.
  39. THOMASON, S. G. (2001), Language Contact. An Introduction, Edinburgh University Press/Georgetown University Press, Edinburgh/Washington DC.
  40. VINEIS, E. (1974), Studi sulla lingua dell’Itala, Pacini, Pisa.
  41. WINFORD, D. (2003), An Introduction to Contact Linguistics, Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA/Oxford.
  42. YAKUBOVICH, I. (2010), Sociolinguistics of the Luvian Language, Brill, Leiden/Boston.