Vol. 57 No. 1 (2019)
Articles

Zii e nipoti in latino e germanico: arcaismo o innovazione?

Andrea Sesoldi
Università di Pisa

Published 2019-07-01

Keywords

  • kinship,
  • uncle,
  • nephew,
  • grandson

Abstract

In ancient Indo-European Languages it is very frequent to use different words for uncles on father and mother sides, but if we examine the facts more in detail, we discover that Latin and West Germanic Languages seem to be closely related in some peculiar features: the uncles of the same sex of the connective parent are named with a noun coming from that for parent himself (O.H.G. fetiro as Lat. patruus ‘uncle on the father side’, O.H.G. muotera as Lat. matertera ‘aunt on the mother side’, §2, 3); the uncles of the opposite sex are not. When we arrive to the uncle on the mother side, another common feature hits our attention: the word for uncle on the mother side is a derivation from that for grandfather (type avus), as also in Slavic and Celtic (Lat. avunculus, West Germanic *awų-haimaz, O.Ch.Sl. uji, §2, 4). The last words we will talk about (§5, 6) are those for nephew and niece, grandson and granddaughter: the type nepos is used at one time for both meanings, both in West Germanic and in Latin, at least at some stage of the language. Could we find a common explanation for all these peculiarities? Are Latin and West Germanic conservative or innovative in these kinship’s nouns? What is the cultural background?

References

  1. BEEKES R. (2010): Etymological Dictionary of Greek. Brill, Leiden-Boston.
  2. BENFEY T. (1860): Ein Abschnitt aus meiner Vorlesung über ,,Vergleichende Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen”. «KZ» 9, pp. 81-132.
  3. BENVENISTE E. (1965): Termes de parenté dans les langues indoeuropéennes. «L’Homme» 5, pp. 5-16.
  4. BENVENISTE E. (1969): Le vocabulaire des institutions Indo-Européennes. Les Editions de Minuit, Paris.
  5. BETTINI M. (2009): Affari di famiglia: la parentela nella letteratura e cultura antica. Il Mulino, Bologna.
  6. BRUGMANN K. (1906): Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen; II, 1: Vergleichende Laut-. Stammbildungs- und Flexionslehre nebst Lehre vom Gebrauch der Wortformen der indogermanischen Sprachen. K. J. Trübner, Strassburg, 2^ ed.
  7. CHANTRAINE P. (1968-70): Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Klincksieck, Paris.
  8. DELBRÜCK B. (1889): Die indogermanischen Verwandtschaftsnamen. In Abhandlungen der philologisch-historischen Classe der Königl. Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften. XI, 5, pp. 379-606. Weidmannsche Buchhandlung, Leipzig.
  9. DERKSEN R. (2008): Etymological Dictionary of the Slavic Inherited Lexicon. Brill, Leiden-Boston.
  10. DEVOTO G. (1962): Origini indoeuropee. Sansoni, Firenze.
  11. DE VAAN M. (2008): Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the other Italic Languages. Brill, Leiden-Boston.
  12. ERNOUT A. e A. MEILLET (1975): Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine. Klincksieck, Paris, 4^ ed.
  13. FEIST S. (1939): Vergleichendes Wörterbuch der gotischen Sprache. Brill, Leiden.
  14. FORCELLINI E. (1864): Lexicon Totius Latinitatis. Gregoriana, Padova 4^ ed., anastatica 1926 (cit. come LTT).
  15. FRAENKEL E. (1962-65): Litauisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. UWH, Heidelberg-Göttingen.
  16. FRISK H. (1960-70): Griechisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. UWH, Heidelberg.
  17. GASPARINI E. (1973): Il matriarcato slavo. Antropologia culturale dei protoslavi. Firenze University Press, Firenze.
  18. HERMANN E. (1918): Sachliches und Sprachliches zur idg. Großfamilie. «Göttingische gelehrte Nachrichten» 170, pp. 204-232.
  19. HOLTHAUSEN F. (1974): Altenglisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. UWH, Heidelberg, 3^ ed.
  20. JONES W. J. (1990): German Kinship Terms (750-1500): documentation and analysis. De Gruyter, Berlin.
  21. KLOEKHORST A. (2008): Etymological Dictionary of the Hittite Inherited Lexicon. Brill, Leiden-Boston.
  22. KLUGE F. (1995): Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. De Gruyter, Berlin-New York, 23^ ed.
  23. LANCASTER L. (1958): Kinship in Anglosaxon Society. «The British Journal of Sociology» 9, pp. 230-248.
  24. LEHMANN W. P. (1986): A Gothic etymological Dictionary. Brill, Leiden.
  25. LEUMANN M. (1977): Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre. Beck, München.
  26. Lietuvių kalbos žodynas (1956-1991) III-XV; I-II 2^ed. (1968). LKI, Vilnius (cit. come LKŽ).
  27. LLOYD A. L. e O. SPRINGER (1988-): Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Althochdeutschen. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen.
  28. LOTH J. (1922): Le sens de Nepos dans deux inscriptions latines de l’île de Bretagne. Compte-rendus de l’Académie des Inscriptions, 66.4, pp. 269-280, Paris.
  29. MARTIROSYAN H. K. (2010): Etymological Dictionary of the Armenian Inherited Lexicon. Brill, Leiden-Boston.
  30. MATASOVIĆ R. (2009): Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Celtic. Brill, Leiden-Boston.
  31. MEILLET A. (1896): Varia. «MSL» 9, pp. 136-159.
  32. MUCH R. (1932): Oheim. «ZfdA» 69, pp. 447-457.
  33. MÜLLER E.E. (1979): Großvater, Enkel, Schwiegersohn: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der Verwandtschaftsbezeichnungen im Deutschen. UWH, Heidelberg.
  34. NOCENTINI A. (2012): Ittita ḫuḫḫa- ‘nonno’ e termini correlati. In Per Roberto Gusmani (studi in ricordo di). Linguistica storica e teorica (2.1). VINCENZO ORIOLES (ed.), Udine. pp. 313-320.
  35. OSTHOFF H. (1888): Oheim. «PBrB» 13, pp. 447-457.
  36. POKORNY J. (1959): Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern Franke, München.
  37. RAU J. (2011): Indo-European Kinship Terminology: *ph2tr-ou̯-/ ph2tr̥-u̯- and his Derivatives. «Historische Sprachforschung» 124, pp. 1-25.
  38. SINGER (1887): Miscellanea. «PBrB» 12, pp. 211-215.
  39. SZEMERÉNYI O. (1977): Studies in the kinship terminology of Indo-European languages. «Acta Iranica» VII, pp. 1-240.
  40. Thesaurus Linguae Latinae (1894-) A-M, O, P. München (cit. come ThLL).
  41. THOMSEN V. (1920): Samlede afhandlinger, 2°vol. Gyldendal, Kopenhagen.
  42. VASMER M. (1953-58): Russisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. UWH, Heidelberg.
  43. VENDRYES J. (1959-1996): Lexique étymologique de l’irlandais ancien. Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, Dublin.
  44. WACKERNAGEL J. e A. DEBRUNNER (1954): Die Nominalsuffixe. In DEBRUNNER (ed.), Altindische Grammatik, II, 2A. Göttingen.
  45. WALDE A. e HOFFMANN J. B. (1965): Lateinisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. UWH, Heidelberg, 4^ ed.