V. 55 N. 1 (2017)
Articoli

Cicli lessicali e polisemia nelle nominalizzazioni. Analisi di un corpus italiano

Raffaele Simone
Dipartimento di Filosofia e Comunicazione Università Roma Tre
Gioia Insacco
Dipartimento di Filosofia e Comunicazione Università Roma Tre

Pubblicato 2017-05-23

Parole chiave

  • nominalization,
  • deverbal nouns,
  • polysemy,

Abstract

The paper aims at proposing a theoretically based interpretation of a typical case of polysemy of deverbal nouns. The pivot notion for this purpose is lexical cycle, the claim that the transition from one meaning to another over time is not accidental at all but follows an ordered path. This path, where metonymy has a significant part, is illustrated and exemplified through an Italian corpus. The prediction entailed by the notion lexical cycle is confirmed by a set of nominalizations, whose semantic expansion respects the cycle. As a side argument, the paper also proposes that the semantic expansions taken into account differ for frequency.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Alexiadou, Artemis. 2010a. Nominalizations: A Probe into the Architecture of Grammar, Part I: The Nominalization Puzzle. Language and Linguistics Compass 4/7: 496-511.
  2. Alexiadou, Artemis. 2010b. Nominalizations: A Probe into the Architecture of Grammar, Part II: The Aspectual Properties of Nominalizations, and the Lexicon vs. Syntax Debate. Language and Linguistics Compass 4/7: 512-23.
  3. Alexiadou, Artemis & Rathert, Monika. (a cura di). 2010. The Semantics of Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks. Berlin & New York: Mouton-De Gruyter.
  4. Alinei, Mario. 1974. La struttura del lessico. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  5. Apresjan, Juri D. 1974. “Regular polysemy”. Linguistics. 12: 5-32.
  6. Asher, Nicholas. 1993. Abstract Objects in Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  7. Baroni, Marco et al. 2004. Introducing the La Repubblica Corpus. A Large, Annotated, TEI(XML)-Compliant Corpus of Newspaper Italian. In Lino M. T. et al. (a cura di), Proceedings of the 4th international conference on language resources and evaluation LREC. 1771-1774. Paris: ELRA European Language Resources Association.
  8. Bertinetto, Pier Marco et al. (a cura di). 1995. Temporal Reference, Aspect and Actionality, vols. 2. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.
  9. Bierwisch, Manfred. 2009. Nominalization. Lexical and Syntactic Aspects. In Rathert Giannakidou A. & M. (a cura di). Quantification, definiteness, and Nominalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Chierchia Gennaro. 1997. Semantica. Bologna: il Mulino.
  11. Comrie, Bernard & Fiorentino, Giuliana (a cura di). 2011. Nouns and Nominalizations Cross-linguistically. Numero speciale di Journal of Italian Linguistics. 23.
  12. Comrie, Bernard & Thomson, Sandra. 2007. Lexical nominalization. in Shopen (2007: 349-398).
  13. Comrie, Bernard. 1976. The Syntax of Action Nominals: A Cross-Linguistic Study. Lingua 40: 177-201.
  14. Culioli, Antoine 1986/1990. Stabilité et déformabilité en linguistique. In Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation. 127-134. Tome 1 : Opérations et représentations. Paris : Ophrys.
  15. De Miguel, Elena. 2000. Relazioni tra il lessico e la sintassi : classi aspettuali di verbi e il passivo spagnolo. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata 2.
  16. Demonte, Violeta. 1991, Teoría sintáctica : de las estructuras a la teoría de la rección. Madrid: Síntesis.
  17. Desclés Jean-Paul. 1989. State, Event, Process, and Topology. General Linguistics 29 : 159-200.
  18. Desclés Jean-Paul & Guentchéva, Zlata. 1995. Is the Notions of Process Necessary ? In Bertinetto et al. (1995 : 55-71).
  19. Dik, Simon C. 1978. Functional Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.
  20. Dik, Simon C. 1985. Formal and semantic adjustment of derived constructions. In M.A. Bolkestein et al. (a cura di). Predicates and Terms in Functional Grammar. 1-28. Dordrecht: Foris.
  21. Falkum, Ingrid & Vicente, Agustín (a cura di). 2015. Polysemy. Current perspectives and approaches. Numero speciale di Lingua 157.
  22. Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge (MA): MIT press.
  23. Fiorentino, Giuliana. 2004. Nomi d’azione e subordinazione in italiano. Studi e saggi linguistici 42: 9-41.
  24. Fruyt, Michèle. 1989. Métaphore, métonymies et synecdoques dans le lexique latin. Glotta 67: 23-40.
  25. Fruyt, Michèle. 1995. Noms de procès en latin. Evaluation des positions benvenistiennes dans Noms d'agent et noms d'action en indo-européen. In Rosen, Hannah (a cura di). Aspects of Latin. 193-206. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.
  26. Gabelentz, Georg von der. 1891 [1901]. Die Sprachwissenshaft. Ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig : Weigel. [reprint Tübingen: Narr 1972].
  27. Gaeta, Livio. 1999. Polisemia e lessicalizzazione: un approccio naturalista. Italienische Studien 20: 7-27.
  28. Gaeta, Livio. 2002. Quando i verbi compaiono come nomi. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  29. Gaeta, Livio. 2004. Nomi d’azione. In Grossman & Rainer (2004: 314-351).
  30. Gelderen, Elly van. 2011. The Linguistic Cycle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  31. Gelderen, Elly van. 2015. The copula cycle. Lingue e linguaggio 14: 287-301.
  32. Giacalone Ramat, Anna & Hopper, Paul J. (a cura di). 1998. The Limits of Grammaticalization. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  33. Grimshaw, Jane. 1989. Argument Structure. MIT Press: Cambridge MA.
  34. Gross, Gaston & Kiefer, Ferenc. 1995. La structure événementielle des substantifs. Folia Linguistica 29 : 29-43.
  35. Grossmann, Maria & Rainer, Franz (a cura di). 2004. La formazione delle parole in italiano. Tubinga: Max Niemeyer.
  36. Haspelmath, Martin 1994. Passive participles across languages. In Fox, Barbara & Hopper, Paul J. (a cura di) Voice: Form and Function. 151-177. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  37. Haiman, John (a cura di). 1985. Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  38. Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, & Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991.Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  39. Hodge, Carleton. 1970. The Linguistic Cycle. Linguistic Sciences 13: 1-7.
  40. Hopper Paul J. & Thompson Sandra A. 1984. The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Language 60: 703-52.
  41. Hopper Paul J. & Thompson Sandra A. 1985. The iconicity of the universal categories ‘noun’ and ‘verb’. In Haiman (1985: 151-183).
  42. Insacco, Gioia. 2015. Strutture argomentali e cicli lessicali delle nominalizzazioni italiane, Tesi di dottorato inedita, Università Roma Tre.
  43. Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.
  44. Jezek, Elisabetta. 2011. Lessico. Classi di parole, strutture, combinazioni. il Mulino: Bologna.
  45. Jezek, Elisabetta. 2008. Polysemy of Italian event nominals. Faits de Langue 30: 251-264.
  46. Jezek, Elisabetta. 2014. Classes of creation verbs. In Simone R. & Masini F. (a cura di), Word Classes. Nature, Typology and Representations. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 37-50.
  47. Kiefer, Ferenc. 1998. Les substantifs déverbaux événementiels. Langages 131: 56-64.
  48. Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 1993. Nominalizations. London: Routledge.
  49. Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2006. Nominalization. In Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics. 2nd edition. 652-659. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  50. Lehmann, Christian. 1982. Nominalisierung: Typisierung von Propositionen. In Seiler, Hansjakob und Christian Lehmann (a cura di). Apprehension. Das sprachliche Erfassung von Gegenständen. Teil I. 66-83. Tübingen: Narr.
  51. Lehmann, Christian. 1990. The Latin nominal group in typological perspective. In Coleman, Robert (a cura di). New Studies in Latin Linguistics: Proceedings of the 4th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics. Cambridge, April 1987. 203-CVCV. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  52. Longrée, Dominique (a cura di). 1995. De Usu. Etudes en honneur de M. Lavency. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters.
  53. Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
  54. Marouzeau Jean. 1910. L’emploi du participe présent latin à l’époque républicaine. Paris : Mémoires de la Société de linguistique de Paris.
  55. Melloni, Chiara. 2006. Logical polysemy in word formation: E and R suffixes. Lingue e linguaggio 2: 281-308.
  56. Melloni, Chiara. 2008. Per una tassonomia dei nominali risultato. In Cresti, Emanuela (a cura di). Atti del Convegno SILFI 2006. Firenze: Firenze University Press.
  57. Melloni, Chiara. 2011. Event and Result Nominals. A morpho-semantic Approach. Berna: Lang.
  58. Mir-Samii, Reza. (a cura di). 2007. Nominalisations. Numero speciale di Faits de langue 30.
  59. Moreno Cabrera, J. C. 1998. On the relationships between grammaticalization and lexicalization. In Giacalone Ramat & Hopper (1998: 211-227).
  60. Mourelatos A. P. D. 1978. Events, Processes, and States. Linguistics and Philosophy 2: 415-434.
  61. Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1995. Transfer of meaning. Journal of semantics, 2: 109-132. (rist. in Pustejovsky, James & Boruraev, Branimir (eds.) 1996. Lexical Semantics. The Problem of Polysemy, Clarendon Press: London).
  62. Panagl, Oswald. 1977. Zum Verhältnis von Agens und Instrument in der Wortbildung. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 16 : 3-17.
  63. Panagl, Oswald. 2006. Zur verbalen Konstruktion deverbativer Nomina. In Crespo, Eugenio, de la Villa, Jesús et al. (a cura di). Word Classes and Related Topics in Ancient Greek. 47-57. Peeters: Louvain-la-Neuve.
  64. Paul, Ileana. (a cura di). 2014. Cross-linguistic Investigations of Nominalization Patterns. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  65. Piunno, Valentina. In stampa. Combinazioni di parole parzialmente riempite. Formati e rappresentazione lessicografica. In stampa in Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Cracovia.
  66. Pustejovsky, James & Busa, Federica. 1995. Unaccusativity and event composition. In Bertinetto (1995: 159-177).
  67. Pustejovskj James. 1991. The Syntax of Event Structure. Cognition 41: 47-81.
  68. Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
  69. Pustejovsky, James. 2005. A survey of dot objects. Author’s Weblog.
  70. Rijkhoff, Jan N. M. 1991. Nominal Aspect. Journal of Semantics 8: 291-309.
  71. Ross, John R. 1972. The Category Squish: Endstation Hauptwort. Chicago Linguistic Society 8: 316-328.
  72. Salvi, Giampaolo. 1988. La frase semplice. In Renzi, Lorenzo et al. (a cura di). Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione. vol. 1. 29-114. Bologna: il Mulino
  73. Shopen, Timothy (a cura di). 2007. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. 3 Voll. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  74. Simone, Raffaele. 2003. Masdar,‘ismu al-marrati et la frontière verbe/nom. In Girón Alconchel, Rafael et al. (a cura di). Estudios ofrecidos al profesor J. Bustos Tovar. 901-918. Madrid: Universidad Complutense.
  75. Thornton, Anna. 1987-88. Sui nomina actionis in italiano. Tesi di Dottorato inedita. Università di Pisa.
  76. Thornton, Anna. 1990. Sui deverbali italiani in -mento e -zione (I). Archivio Glottologico Italiano 75: 169: 207.
  77. Traugott, Elisabeth C. & Dasher, Richard. 2005. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  78. Vendler, Zeno. 1968. Adjectives and Nominalizations, The Hague & Parigi: Mouton.
  79. Verkuyl H. J. 1996. A Theory of Aspectuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  80. Zeegers-Vander Vorst N. 1995. Les fonctions du participe en grec et latin. In Longrée (1995: 345-364).
  81. Zwanenburg W. 1990-91. French deverbal nouns and argument structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 40 : 189-210.