Studi e Saggi Linguistici

V. 56 N. 2 (2018)
Articoli

Continuum di complessità: verso una definizione tipologica del formato di parola

PDF
  • Vittorio Ganfi
Vittorio Ganfi
Università degli studi "Roma Tre"
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4454/ssl.v56i2.197

Pubblicato 2018-12-20

Parole chiave

  • Complessità,
  • sistema di allineamento,
  • formato morfologico,
  • economia e iconicità
Informativa sui diritti

Abstract

This work aims at putting in relation the morphological structure of words with typological features formally autonomous from morphology. In particular, two linguistic types emerge from this analysis: a. Simple Languages, characterized by morphologically simple word structures, topic-prominent alignment systems and flexible word classes; b. Complex Languages, preferring polysynthetic words, a semantic alignment, as well as the incorporation of nouns into verbal nucleus. Furthermore, the inquiry of wide corpora of language structures shows widespread correlations between the alignment systems and the morphological complexity.

Cross-linguistic correlations are explained by the “Complexity Continuum”, according to which the distribution of typological features can be traced back to the functional principles of economy and iconicity.
PDF

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. BICKEL, B. e NICHOLS J. (2013), Inflectional Synthesis of the Verb, in DRYER, M. S. e HASPELMATH, M. (2013, eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig. (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/22, Accessed on 2016-11-19.)
  2. BISANG, W. (2009), On the evolution of complexity — sometimes less is more in East and mainland Southeast Asia, in SAMPSON, G., GIL, D. e TRUDGILL, P. (2009, eds.) Language complexity as an evolving variable, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 34 – 49.
  3. BISANG, W. (2010), Word Classes, in SONG, J. J. (2010, ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 281–300.
  4. BISANG, W. (2015), Hidden Complexity – The Neglected Side of Complexity and Its Implications, «Linguistics Vanguar», 1, pp. 177–187.
  5. COMRIE, B. (1978), Ergativity, in LEHMANN, W. P. (1978, ed.), Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language, University of Texas Press, Austin, pp. 329-374.
  6. COMRIE, B. (1988), Topics, Grammaticalized Topics, and Subjects, in AXMAKER, S. e SINGMASTER, H. (1988, eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, pp. 265-279.
  7. COMRIE, B. (1989), Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  8. COMRIE, B. (2013), Alignment of Case Marking of Full Noun Phrases, in DRYER, M. S. e HASPELMATH, M. (2013, eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig. (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/22, Accessed on 2016-11-19.)
  9. CRISTOFARO, S. (2014), Competing motivation models and diachrony: What evidence for what motivations?, in MACWHINNEY, B., MALCHUKOV, A. e MORAVCSIK, A. (2014, eds.), Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 282-298.
  10. DAHL, Ö. (2004), The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity, John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam-Philadelphia.
  11. DIXON, R. M. W. (1979), Ergativity, «Language», 55, pp. 59-138.
  12. DIXON, R. M. W. (1994), Ergativity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  13. DRYER, M. S. (2013). Order of Subject, Object and Verb. , in DRYER, M. S. e HASPELMATH, M. (2013, eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig. (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/22, Accessed on 2016-11-19.)
  14. DUBOIS, J. (1985), Competing motivations, in HAIMAN, J. (1985, ed.). Iconicity in Syntax. Proceedings of a symposium on iconicity in syntax, John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, pp. 343–65.
  15. DUPONCEAU, P. (1819), Report of the corresponding secretary to the committee, of his progress in the investigation committed to him of the general character and forms of the languages of the American Indians, «Transactions of the Historical & Literary Committee of the American Philosophical Society», 1, pp.14-46.
  16. EVANS, N. e SASSE, H. J. (2002), Introduction: problems of polysynthesis, in EVANS, N. e SASSE, H. J. (2002, eds.), Problems of Polysynthesis, Akademie Verlag, Berlin, pp. 1-14.
  17. GANFI, V. (2016), La grammaticalizzazione dei sistemi di allineamento: diacronia, tipologia e struttura, tesi di dottorato, Università degli Studi di Roma Tre.
  18. GANFI, V. (in stampa), Il ruolo delle aspettative nell’apprendimento linguistico: modelli teorici e dati empirici, in Atti del XIV Congresso della Società internazionale di Linguistica e Filologia italiana.
  19. GIL, D. (2000), Syntactic categories, cross-linguistic variation and universal grammar, in VOGEL, P. M. e COMRIE, B. (2000, eds.), Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin-New York, pp. 173–216.
  20. GIL, D. (2013), Riau Indonesian: a language without nouns and verbs, in VAN LIER, E. e RIJKHOFF, J. (2013, eds.) Flexible Word Classes: Typological Studies of Underspeciï¬ed Parts of Speech, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 89-103.
  21. GIVÓN, T. (1984), Syntax: a functional-typological introduction, John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam-Philadelphia.
  22. GOOD, J. (2016), The Linguistic Typology of Template, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  23. GREENBERG, J. (1976), Un approccio quantitativo alla tipologia morfologica, in RAMAT, P. (1976, a cura di). La tipologia linguistica, Il Mulino, Bologna, pp. 239-273.
  24. GREENBERG, J. (1990, [19601]), On language: Selected writings of Joseph Greenberg, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
  25. HAIMAN, J. (1980), The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation, «Language», 56, pp. 515–40.
  26. HAIMAN, J. (1985), Iconicity in Syntax. Proceedings of a symposium on iconicity in syntax, Stanford, John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam-Philadelphia.
  27. HASPELMATH, M. (1993), More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations, in COMRIE, B. e POLINSKY, M. (1993, eds.), Causatives and transitivity, John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, pp. 87-120.
  28. HASPELMATH, M., DRYER, M., GIL, D., e COMRIE, B. (2005), The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  29. HENGEVELD, K. (1992), Non-verbal predication. Theory, Typology, Diachrony, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin-New York.
  30. HENGEVELD, K. (2007), Parts-of-speech systems and morphological types, «ACLC Working Papers», 2 , pp. 31–48.
  31. IGGESEN, O. A. (2013), Number of Cases, in DRYER, M. S. e HASPELMATH, M. (2013, eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig. (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/22, Accessed on 2016-11-19.)
  32. JAKOBSON, R. (1971), Selected writings, Mouton, The Hague-Paris.
  33. LI, C. e THOMPSON, S. (1976), A new typology of language, in LI, C. (1976, ed.), Subject and Topic, Academic Press, New York. pp. 457-489.
  34. MEREU, L. (2004), La sintassi nelle lingue del mondo, Laterza, Roma.
  35. MEREU, L. (2008), Universals of information structures, in MEREU, L. (2008, ed.) Information structure and its interfaces, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin-New York, pp. 75-105.
  36. MIESTAMO, M. (2008), Grammatical complexity in cross-linguistic perspective, in MIESTAMO, M., SINNEMAKI, K. e KARLSSON, F. (2008, eds.), Language complexity: typology, contact, change, John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, pp. 4-42.
  37. MINEGISHI, M. (2011), Description of Thai as an isolating language, «Social Science Information», 50, pp. 62 –80.
  38. MITHUN, M. (1984), The Evolution of Noun Incorporation, «Language», 60, pp. 847-893.
  39. MITHUN, M. (1991), Active/agentive case marking and its motivations, «Language», 67, pp. 510–546.
  40. MITHUN, M. (1994), The implications of ergativity for a Philippine voice system, in FOX, B. e HOPPER, P. (1994, eds.), Voice: its Form and Function. John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, pp. 247-277.
  41. MITHUN, M. (2009), Polysynthesis in the Arctic, in MAHIEU, M. e TERSIS, N. (2009, eds.), Variations on Polysynthesis: The Eskaleut languages, John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, pp. 3-18.
  42. MITHUN, M. (2013), Seminario dottorale, Università Roma Tre.
  43. MITHUN, M. e CHAFE, W. (1999), What are S, A, and O?, «Studies in Language», 23, pp. 579-606.
  44. NEWMEYER, F. (1992), Iconicity and generative grammar, «Language», 68, pp. 756-96.
  45. NICHOLS, J. (1992), Linguistic diversity in space and time, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  46. NICHOLS, J. (2009), Linguistic complexity: a comprehensive definition and survey, in SAMPSON, G., GIL, D. e TRUDGILL, P. (2009, eds.) Language complexity as an evolving variable, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 110-125.
  47. PAYNE, T. (1997), Describing morpho-syntax: a guideline for field linguistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  48. RAMAT, P. (1976), La tipologia linguistica, Il Mulino, Bologna.
  49. RAMAT, P. (1999), Linguistic categories and linguists’ categorizations, «Linguistics», 37, pp. 157-180.
  50. REUSE, W. (2009), Polysynthesis as a typological feature: An attempt at a characterization from Eskimo and Athabascan perspectives, in MAHIEU, M. e TERSIS, N. (2009, eds.), Variations on Polysynthesis: The Eskaleut languages John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, pp. 19-34.
  51. RIJKHOFF, J. e VAN LIER, E. (2013), Flexible word classes in linguistic typology and grammatical theory, in VAN LIER, E. e RIJKHOFF, J. (2013, eds.), Flexible Word Classes: Typological Studies of Underspeciï¬ed Parts of Speech,Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1-26.
  52. ROOD, D. (1971), Agent and object in Wichita, «Lingua», 28, pp. 100-107.
  53. SIEWIERSKA, A. (2013), Alignment of Verbal Person Marking, DRYER, M. S. e HASPELMATH, M. (2013, eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig. (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/100, Accessed on 2016-11-23.)
  54. SIMONE, R. (1995), Iconicity in Language. Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam-Philadelphia.
  55. SIMONE, R. (2006), Constructions : types, niveaux, force pragmatique, in GUILLOT, C., HEIDEN, S. e PREVOST, S. (2006, a cura di), A la quête du sens. Etudes littéraires, historiques et linguistiques en hommage à Christiane Marchello-Nizia, ENS, Lyon, pp. 137-159.
  56. SIMONE, R. (2007), Constructions and categories in verbal and signed languages, in PIETRANDREA, P. e SIMONE, R. (2007, eds.), Verbal and Signed Languages. Comparing Structures, Constructs, and methodologies, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin-New York, pp. 198-252.
  57. SIMONE, R. (2017), Word as a stratification of formats, in D’Alessandro, R., Iannàccaro, G., Passino, D. e Thornton, A. (2017, a cura di), Di tutti i colori. Studi linguistici per Maria Grossmann, Ediz. Online.
  58. SIMONE, R. e POMPEI, A. (2007), Traits verbaux dans les noms et les formes nominalisées du verbe, «Faits de langue», 30, pp. 43-58.
  59. TELLERMAN, M. (2014), Understanding Syntax, Routledge, London.
  60. Van VALIN, R. (1990), Semantic parameters of split intransitivity, «Language», 66, pp. 221-60.