Vol. 56 No. 2 (2018)

Between prosody and grammar: the case of rhetorical questions

Patrizia Sorianello
Università degli Studi di Bari

Published 2018-12-20


  • rhetorical questions,
  • intonation,
  • pragmatic functions


This study examines the prosodic structure of Italian rhetorical questions (RQs). Unlike the ordinary questions, RQs are not realized for achieving information and do not require an explicit answer. RQs are hybrid utterances, since they have the surface structure of a question, but the pragmatic meaning of a statement.

As far as prosody is concerned, RQs have received little attention so far, especially with reference to Italian language. This study presents an acoustic analysis of a sample of identical questions with literary and rhetorical meaning. The research aims to verify whether RQs have an own prosodic identity in comparison with yes/no or wh- seeking-information questions. The experimental results provide an unclear framework. RQs and ordinary questions are not always melodically different, although RQs have more frequently a final falling contour. We believe that the high number of discursive functions performed by RQs plays a crucial role in the realization of  intonation contours.


  1. ANZILOTTI, G.I., (1982), The rhetorical question as an indirect speech device in English and Italian,
  2. in «Canadian Modern Language Review», 38, pp. 290-302.
  3. AUSTIN, J.L. (1962), How to do things with words, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
  4. BANUAZIZI, A. e CRESWELL, C. (1999), Is that a real question?: Final rises, final falls and discourse function in yes-no question intonation, in Proceedings of the 35th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society (CLS 35), Chicago, Linguistic Society, pp. 1-14
  5. BARTELS, S.C. (2013), The intonation of English statements and questions. A compositional interpretation, Routledge, New York & London, 1 ediz 1999, Garland Publishing.
  6. BECKMAN, M.E. e AYERS ELAM, G. (1997), Guidelines for ToBI labelling, version 3.0, The Ohio State University Research Foundation, http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/phonetics/E_ToBI/ singer_tobi.html.
  7. BOERSMA, P. e WEENINK, D. (2013), Praat: doing phonetics by computer, version 5.3.51, http://www.praat.org, accessed 2 June 2017.
  8. BOLINGER, D.L. (1957), Interrogative structures of American English, Tuscaloosa, AL, University of Alabama Press.
  9. BOLINGER, D.L. (1989), Intonation and its uses. Melody in grammar and discourse, London, Edward Arnold.
  10. BROWN, P. e LEVINSON, S. (1978), Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena, in GOODY, E. (ed.), Questions and politeness: strategies in social interaction, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 56-311.
  11. CAPONIGRO, I. e SPROUSE, J. (2007), Rhetorical questions as questions, in PUIG-WALDMULLER, E. (ed.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 11, pp. 121-133.
  12. CHEN, H.J. (2006), A Study of pragmatic prototypical categories of rhetorical questions, Shiying: Jinzhou, Liaoning.
  13. CRISARI, M. (1974), Sugli usi non istituzionali delle domande, in «Lingua e Stile», 1, pp. 29-56.
  14. CRUTTENDEN, A. (1981), Falls and rises: meaning and universals, in «Journal of Linguistics», 17, pp. 77-91.
  15. DA MILANO, F. (2004), Le domande sì/no nelle lingue del Mediterraneo, in «Archivio Glottologico Italiano», LXXXIX (1), pp. 3-40.
  16. FAVA, E. (1995), Il tipo interrogativo, in RENZI, L., SALVI, G. e CARDINALETTI, A. (a cura di), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, vol. 3, Tipi di frase, deissi, formazione delle parole, Bologna, Il Mulino, pp. 70-127.
  17. FRANK, J. (1990), You call that a rhetorical question? Forms and functions of rhetorical questions in conversation, in «Journal of Pragmatics», 14 (5), pp. 723-738.
  18. GILI FIVELA, B., AVESANI, C., BARONE, M., BOCCI, G., CROCCO, C., D’IMPERIO, M.P., GIORDANO, R., MAROTTA, G., SAVINO, M. e SORIANELLO, P. (2015), Intonational phonology of the regional varieties of Italian, in FROTA, S. e PRIETO, P. (eds.), Intonation in Romance, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 140-197.
  19. GUMPERZ, J. (1982), Discourse Strategies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  20. GUNLOGSON, C. (2001), True to form: Rising and falling declaratives as questions in English. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz, Routledge, London, 2003.
  21. GRICE, M. (1995), The intonation of interrogation of Palermo Italian. Implication for intonation theory, Tübingen, Niemeyer.
  22. GRICE, M., D’IMPERIO, M.P., SAVINO, M. e AVESANI, C. (2005), Strategies for intonation labelling across varieties of Italian, in JUN S.-A. (ed.), Prosodic Typology. The phonology of intonation and phrasing, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 362-389.
  23. GRICE, P. (1975), Logic and conversation, in COLE, P., MORGAN, J.L. (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3, Speech Acts, New York, Academic Press, pp. 41-58.
  24. GUTIÉRREZ REXACH, J. (1998), Rhetorical question, relevance and scales, in «Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses », 11, pp. 139-155.
  25. HAN, C. (2002), Interpreting interrogatives as rhetorical questions, in «Lingua», 112, pp. 112-229.
  26. HUDSON, R. (1975), The meaning of questions, in «Language», 51, pp. 1-31.
  27. ILIE, C. (1994), What else can I tell you? A pragmatic study of English rhetorical questions as discursive and argumentative acts, Stockholm Studies in English, vol. 72. Almqvist & Wiksell International, Stockholm.
  28. KOSHIK, I. (2005), Beyond rhetorical question. Assertive questions in everyday conversation, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
  29. LADD, D.R. (1996), Intonational phonology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  30. LEE-GOLDMAN, R. (2006), A typology of rhetorical question, Syntax and Semantics Circle, pp- 1-10.
  31. LEPSCHY, G.C. (1978), Appunti sull’intonazione italiana, in LEPSCHY, G.C., (a cura di), Saggi di linguistica italiana, Il Mulino, Bologna, pp. 127-142.
  32. MIURA, I. e HARA, N. (1995), Production and perception of rhetorical questions in Osaka Japanese, in «Journal of Phonetics», 23, pp. 291-303.
  33. PIERREHUMBERT, J.B. e HIRSCHBERG, J. (1990), The meaning of intonation contours in the interpretation of discourse, in COHEN, P., MORGAN, J. e POLLACK, M. (eds.), Intentions in communication, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA.), pp. 271-276.
  34. POPE, E.N. (1976), Questions and answers in English. The Hague: Mouton.
  35. QUIRK, R., GREENBAUM, S. G.N., LEECH e SVARTVIK, J. (1985), A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, Longman, London.
  36. ROHDE, H. (2006), Rhetorical questions as redundant interrogatives. In San Diego Linguistics Paper, 2, University of California, San Diego, pp. 134-168.
  37. ROOY, R. van (2003), Negative polarity items in questions: Strength as relevance, in «Journal of Semantics», 20(3), pp. 239-273.
  38. SADOCK, J.M. (1971), Queclaratives. In Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, (CLS 7), Chicago, Linguistics Society, pp. 223-231.
  39. SADOCK, J.M. (1974), Some covert illocutionary acts in English, in SADOCK J.M., (ed.), Toward a linguistic theory of speech acts, Academic Press: New York/London, pp. 111-146.
  40. SADOCK, J. M. e ZWICKY, A. M. (1985), Speech act distinctions in syntax, in SHOPEN, T. (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 155-196.
  41. SAVINO, M. (2012), The intonation of polar questions in Italian: where is the rise?, in «Journal of the International Phonetic Association», 42(1), pp. 23-48.
  42. SCHMIDT-RADEFELDT, J. (1977), On so-called “rhetorical” questions, in «Journal of Pragmatics»,1(4), pp. 375-392.
  43. SEARLE, J.R. (1969), Indirect speech acts, in COLE, P. e MORGAN, J.L. (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3, Speech Acts, New York, Academic Press, pp. 59-82.
  44. SORIANELLO, P. (2006), Prosodia. Modelli e ricerca empirica, Carocci, Roma.
  45. STALNAKER, R. (1978), Assertion, in COLE, P. (ed.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 9, Pragmatics, Academic Press, New York, pp. 315-322.
  46. STATI, S. (1982), Le frasi interrogative retoriche, in «Lingua e Stile», XVII(2), pp. 195-207.
  47. ULTAN, R. (1978), Some general characteristics of interrogative systems, in GREENBERG, J.H., FERGUSON, P.C.A. e MORAVCSICK, E.A. (eds.), Universals of human language, vol. 4, Syntax, Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp. 211-248.
  48. WOCHNER, D., SCHLEGEL, J., DEHÉ, N. e BRAUN, B. (2015), The prosodic marking of rhetorical questions in German, in 16th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2015, pp. 987-991.